Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA00846; Mon, 10 Apr 1995 11:21:51 -0700 Return-Path: <Geoffrey.Boehm@wj.com-DeleteThis> Received: from gatekeeper.wj.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA145483765; Mon, 10 Apr 1995 10:09:27 -0700 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gatekeeper.wj.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA18474 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 10 Apr 1995 10:03:00 -0700 Received: from internal.wj.com(144.172.5.12) by gatekeeper via smap (V1.3) id sma018472; Mon Apr 10 10:02:49 1995 Received: from ccsmtp.wj.com by internal.wj.com with SMTP id AA07287 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>); Mon, 10 Apr 1995 10:07:09 -0700 Received: from ccMail by ccsmtp.wj.com (IMA Internet Exchange v1.03) id f8966400; Mon, 10 Apr 95 10:09:20 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 09:56:34 -0700 Message-Id: <f8966400@ccsmtp.wj.com-DeleteThis> From: Geoffrey.Boehm@wj.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re[2]: Anyone sail this weekend? To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Content-Type: text/plain; name=Text_1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
And how about Waddell? As I lay on my back in pain, barely able to
move, let alone sail, listening to the COTW beeper go off, I wondered
if it was really as good as the reports (ave 23-26) said?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:29:03 PST