Re: Eastshore Reg. Park Meeting Comments

From: Jerry (jerrygar1@home.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2001 - 10:24:35 PDT


X-OldHeader: From jerrygar1@home.com-DeleteThis.com  Sat Sep 29 10:26:03 2001
Return-Path: <jerrygar1@home.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA04998 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (msgbas2.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.34]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA19499 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.87]) by msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148DFEC1 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 11:25:57 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from c117234a ([24.20.176.48]) by femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010929172507.GRXM17662.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@c117234a> for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:25:07 -0700
Message-ID: <002301c1490c$6f4347c0$30b01418@pinol1.sfba.home.com-DeleteThis.com>
From: "Jerry" <jerrygar1@home.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
References: <v04020a01b7dba3b853a7@[24.12.42.155]>
Subject: Re: Eastshore Reg. Park Meeting Comments
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 10:24:35 -0700
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600


David,

Good report. From the number of cars parked with windsurfers or racks on top
I think there were quite a few of us there. I did not speak to anyone who
thought Alternative A (limited use) was worthwhile. It did seem that the
needs of kayakers were greatly emphasized--floating docks, launches, camp
sites! Do they have a big lobby? Were any use studies done? How many
windsurfers, kayakers, kite flyers (land based), dog walkers, etc. use the
space now?

I got the impression one proposal included with Alternative B was to make
the spit of land that leads out to the Bulb moderate use, which implies
parking. There are several spots along there that could be made into launch
sites. The beach behind Golden Gate Fields would also make a good kite
launch area for advanced kiters. You have to go upwind off the beach with
short reaches to clear the Bulb. A few launch there now.

The web site is supposed to allow for additional comments. The address was
on i-Windsurf but I can't find it now. If that is the case we should all put
in comments.

Jerry



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:21 PST