Return-Path: <george@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id LAA14153 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id LAA25307 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:23:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D9A57F for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:23:22 -0600 (MDT) Received: from adsl ([63.201.130.142]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with SMTP id <0FZC0080HIMQAN@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net-DeleteThis> for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis; Tue, 15 Aug 2000 11:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 12:17:08 -0700 From: George Haye <george@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis> Subject: RE: How was Waddell? In-reply-to: <200008151800.LAA17646@supernova.cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis> To: Matt Chapman <mchapman@cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis>, wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis Reply-To: george@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis Message-id: <003c01c006ed$67a8b7a0$2901a8c0@pacbell.net-DeleteThis> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Matt, Ed,
Yes - our Waddell sensor is fine and will stay as it is now. The sensor
notes on the Waddell 'local info' page give a bit more background on sensor
location, etc.
Looks like another great day on the Peninsula and the coast... Sounds like a
big south swell may be heading our way. Happy sailing everyone...
~George
iWindsurf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Chapman [mailto:mchapman@cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 11:00 AM
To: support@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: How was Waddell?
iWindsurf,
I agree with Ed, please ignore all requests to tweak a sensor reading.
I and the hundreds of other customers who have their brains calibrated
to the sensors say thanks.
- Matt
__________________________ Reply Separator _______________________
>Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 10:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
>Reply-To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
>Originator: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
>Sender: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis
>Precedence: bulk
>From: "Ed @ Best" <edscott@best.com-DeleteThis>
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Comment: Windsurfing Discussion Mailing List
>Content-Type: text
>Content-Length: 684
>
>I disagree. We've already been through this a number of times at a number
>of sites. All it adds is more errors and more confusion.
>
>Please don't start messing with the sensors again! Sailors, calibrate your
>brains to what the sensors report, don't calibrate the sensors to what your
>brain perceives!
>
>-Ed
>
>
>on 8/15/00 10:14 AM, Sergei Burkov at bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis wrote:
>
>> iWindsurf guys!
>> Are you there?
>>
>> Waddell sensor is underreporting big time! Please fix it.
>>
>> I sent two messages regarding this to your feedback@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis or
>> whatever your webpage recommended. No reply, no thank you, no go to hell,
no
>> nothing. I suspect nobody reads it. Please pay attention.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:37 PDT