Return-Path: <rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA25017 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:02:05 -0700 (PDT) From: rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis Received: from msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA24484 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yridian.wellsfargo.com (yridian.wellsfargo.com [204.151.114.19]) by msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4387F168 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 11:02:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from unixm3.wellsfargo.com (unixm3.wellsfargo.com [10.12.71.94]) by yridian.wellsfargo.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e7GH3Qm20469 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 10:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xcgi-aztem-01.wellsfargo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unixm3.wellsfargo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA29191 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by imc3.wellsfargo.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <Q8ZCHTFG>; Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:58:06 -0700 Message-ID: <8B034BE24156D3119CF90001FA7EEA810221C778@xcem-casfo-04.wellsfargo.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis Subject: RE: How was Waddell? Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 09:58:05 -0700 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
My very heart felt vote is to leave all sensors with no calibration. My
brain works far far better than any "correction" and I've never had as
reliable information after "correction" as I had before.
CINDOLL
-----Original Message-----
From: Ed @ Best [mailto:edscott@best.com-DeleteThis]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 10:33 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: How was Waddell?
I disagree. We've already been through this a number of times at a number
of sites. All it adds is more errors and more confusion.
Please don't start messing with the sensors again! Sailors, calibrate your
brains to what the sensors report, don't calibrate the sensors to what your
brain perceives!
-Ed
on 8/15/00 10:14 AM, Sergei Burkov at bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis wrote:
> iWindsurf guys!
> Are you there?
>
> Waddell sensor is underreporting big time! Please fix it.
>
> I sent two messages regarding this to your feedback@iwindsurf.com-DeleteThis or
> whatever your webpage recommended. No reply, no thank you, no go to hell,
no
> nothing. I suspect nobody reads it. Please pay attention.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:38 PDT