Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA027365081; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:38:01 -0700 Return-Path: <harris@Synopsys.COM-DeleteThis> Received: from hplabs.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA019945072; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:37:52 -0700 Received: from hamachi.synopsys.com (hamachi.synopsys.com [146.225.8.26]) by hplabs.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6 HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id NAA14680 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from javelin.synopsys.com (javelin.synopsys.com [146.225.100.38]) by hamachi.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA03638 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from torch.synopsys.com.synopsys.com (torch.synopsys.com [146.225.100.31]) by javelin.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA25992 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from synopsys.com by torch.synopsys.com.synopsys.com (8.8.8/SNPS-Sol2) id NAA20125; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3630E698.346B0092@synopsys.com-DeleteThis> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 13:27:04 -0700 From: Greg Harris <harris@Synopsys.COM-DeleteThis> Organization: Synopsys X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; I) To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: Coyote Alert References: <3630E0DD.435C@nablewest.com-DeleteThis> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>I agree
>this could be a significant problem, but I'd hate to cry wolf.
As long as it has the potential to be a significant problem we need to
raise the issue: we only have till next Wedensday before this is a done
deal. How can there be any sort of impact study within that time? The
last thing we want to do is wait until they are built before we realize,
"Hey those buildings really screwed this site up. Bummer". What scares
me is the width of those things. The hotel that really screws up the
reach in Aruba is the Marriott. Nice and wide.
Greg
Rick Weiss wrote:
>
> Martin Frankel wrote:
> [snip]
> > This is all speculation, I don't really know the first thing about the
> > physics involved. If anyone has better knowledge of this or perhaps
> > references, I think it would be very interesting. Still, the first
> > priority is to get the issue on the table... send those letters!
>
> I'm confused. We cannot decide whether these buildings would REALLY
> affect our launch, but we should fax those letters, which say they
> would "severely impact, and possibly destroy" our launch. I agree
> this could be a significant problem, but I'd hate to cry wolf.
>
> (I'm trying to picture standing in the parking lot, and mentally
> place the proposed buildings. They don't seem to be directly upwind.
> Does anyone have a map, where they could plot the proposed buildings,
> and draw a line at 260 degrees --- the point where it starts to become
> too southwest-- to see where that hits Coyote point?)
>
> --rickw
> --
> +-------------------------------------------------+
> Rick Weiss N*ABLE Technologies
> rickw@nabletech.com-DeleteThis Cupertino, CA USA
> rickw@slip.net-DeleteThis 408- 873-2270 x118
> +-------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2013 - 02:03:01 PST