Re: Re[2]: San Luis Reservoir Question

From: Martin Frankel (mdf@sgi.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Mon Jul 06 1998 - 14:47:34 PDT


Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA195021910; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 14:51:50 -0700
Return-Path: <mdf@bluedini.engr.sgi.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA032551901; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 14:51:41 -0700
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6 HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id OAA24502 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 14:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2])  by sgi.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.)  via ESMTP id OAA04496 for <@sgi.engr.sgi.com:wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 14:47:36 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mdf@bluedini.engr.sgi.com-DeleteThis)
Received: from bluedini.engr.sgi.com (bluedini.engr.sgi.com [130.62.244.69]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA21005 for <@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com:wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 14:47:35 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mdf@bluedini.engr.sgi.com-DeleteThis)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bluedini.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA207876 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 14:47:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199807062147.OAA207876@bluedini.engr.sgi.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
From: Martin Frankel <mdf@sgi.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: Re: Re[2]: San Luis Reservoir Question 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Jul 98 14:35:15 PDT." <199807062127.OAA13253@cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis> 
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 98 14:47:34 -0700
Sender: mdf@bluedini.engr.sgi.com-DeleteThis


> But the northwest (offshore) side has a campground in the back that
> looks like it might be better protected (lots of trees) and might
> even have showers.

I believe it does have showers. It is not protected. It has a few
scraggly trees but the only real protection is to set up your tent
downwind of your vehicle (that's what we did, but the ranger didn't
like it). I haven't camped on the downwind shore, maybe it's even
worse there.

It does have firepits.. we were able to light a fire and BBQ some
steaks despite 25+ winds. Quite an experience.

--
Martin Frankel     ||||     mdf@sgi.com-DeleteThis     ||||     (650)933-6191



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2013 - 02:01:20 PST