Re: Interpreting the sherman isl (windcraft) windtalker?

From: Dan Farmer (danf@play.asd.sgi.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Tue Sep 05 1995 - 10:16:31 PDT


Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA04353; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:28:15 -0700
Return-Path: <danf@play.asd.sgi.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from sgigate.sgi.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA008295763; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:29:23 -0700
Received: from sgihub.corp.sgi.com by sgigate.sgi.com via ESMTP (950511.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH526/940406.SGI) for <@sgigate.sgi.com:wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> id LAA23909; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 11:24:13 -0700
Received: from giraffe.asd.sgi.com by sgihub.corp.sgi.com via SMTP (950511.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH526/911001.SGI) for <@sgihub.corp.sgi.com:wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> id KAA20594; Tue, 5 Sep 1995 10:16:36 -0700
Received: from play.asd.sgi.com by giraffe.asd.sgi.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI) for @sgihub.corp.sgi.com:wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis id AA07678; Tue, 5 Sep 95 10:16:33 -0700
Received: by play.asd.sgi.com (931110.SGI/940406.SGI.AUTO) for @giraffe.asd.sgi.com:wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis id AA00728; Tue, 5 Sep 95 10:16:31 -0700
From: "Dan Farmer" <danf@play.asd.sgi.com-DeleteThis>
Message-Id: <9509051016.ZM726@play.asd.sgi.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 10:16:31 -0700
In-Reply-To: schuh@apm-iris1.arc.nasa.gov-DeleteThis (Michael Schuh) "Re:  Interpreting the sherman isl (windcraft) windtalker?" (Aug 29,  9:28am)
References: <199508291622.QAA12476@apm-iris1.arc.nasa.gov-DeleteThis>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail-SGI (3.0S.1026 26oct93 MediaMail)
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: Interpreting the sherman isl (windcraft) windtalker?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Aug 29, 9:28am, Michael Schuh wrote:
> Subject: Re: Interpreting the sherman isl (windcraft) windtalker?
> Opps, now http://www.kpix.com/faircam/big.html
> is showing almost total fog. I checked the time very
> carefully (at least I thought I did) before posting
> the previous message. Next time I will "reload" the
> image before claiming no fog.
>
> Sorry,
> Schuh
>
> > There is not any fog at the GG bridge right now. Look for yourself
> > http://www.kpix.com/faircam/big.html
> >
> > Schuh
>-- End of excerpt from Michael Schuh

There is a problem with the updating of the "/big" url at KPIX's web site.
 I've mentioned it to them, but it's low on the list, apparently. Reloading
will not help, as the picture is not being updated to match the small pix. If
you go in through their home page, or go back there from the "/big" thang, you
can check if the pix match. Sometimes the big picture is hours old.

Hope this helps-
-df



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:30:09 PST