Re: Re: Dynafiber booms

From: Ken Poulton (poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Thu Nov 17 1994 - 12:06:32 PST


Received: from zonker-fddi.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA22001; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 12:06:35 -0800
Return-Path: <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Received: by zonker.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA21786; Thu, 17 Nov 1994 12:06:32 -0800
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 12:06:32 -0800
From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Message-Id: <9411172006.AA21786@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: Re: Dynafiber booms


> I switched from Fiberspar to Dynafiber masts and Gulftech booms, and my
> equipment failures *ended*. My next boom will be a either a Dynafiber
> or another Gulftech.

You're not willing to trust a Fiberspar boom whose arms are well-proven
and front-end now has a year's successful track record, but you are willing
to trust a Dynafiber boom the first year they make them with *no* history
at all?

Ken Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:23 PST