Re: WAVES Rule!

• Next message: Peter Uehlin: "Board Recommendation"
• Previous message: David R. Fielder: "Surfer Battle"
• In reply to: Ed Scott: "Re: wave rules question"
• Next in thread: Tom von Alten: "Re: wave rules question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

X-OldHeader: From twavo@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com  Thu Apr 11 18:58:04 2002
Return-Path: <twavo@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id SAA09739 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com [141.183.101.235]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id SAA17617 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by msgbas1.sgp.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64ED260 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 09:58:00 +0800 (SGP)
Received: from user-2ivfmbl.dialup.mindspring.com ([165.247.217.117]) by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16vqK6-0002ZS-00 for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:57:58 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:58:14 -0700
Subject: Re: WAVES Rule!
From: Tony Dominski <twavo@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Message-ID: <B8DB8D46.AD%twavo@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8D8843B.6BF3%edscott@best.com-DeleteThis.com>

on 4/9/02 11:54 AM, Ed Scott at edscott@best.com-DeleteThis.com wrote:

> Sailor A, usually asserted by a whistle or shout if B doesn't see him. B
> should fade or kick out. Sometimes B doesn't see or hear (or pretends to, a
> not infrequent occurrence) A,

It really gets peculiar when C shows up shlogging out through the impact
zone smack dab in between A and B.
But, Don't forget guys, the Waves rule.

C should get the sympathy, and A has the lead, but B sometimes has to let
nature take its course. We all have to look out for the other guy.
Twavo

• Next message: Peter Uehlin: "Board Recommendation"
• Previous message: David R. Fielder: "Surfer Battle"
• In reply to: Ed Scott: "Re: wave rules question"
• Next in thread: Tom von Alten: "Re: wave rules question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:05:53 PDT