X-OldHeader: From Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com Tue Feb 26 20:04:19 2002 Return-Path: <Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id UAA20466 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:04:19 -0800 (PST) From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com Received: from msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.33]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id UAA12043 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from imo-r09.mx.aol.com (imo-r09.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.105]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE682145 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:04:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com by imo-r09.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id v.f4.17692065 (3933) for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:04:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <f4.17692065.29adb4ba@aol.com-DeleteThis.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 23:04:10 EST Subject: Re: Coyote Point Master Plan To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139
In a message dated 2/26/02 6:12:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, tva@pobox.com-DeleteThis.com
writes:
> I'm not in a position to attend meetings these days (it's
> a long drive from Idaho), but I'm curious about this plan.
> My biggest gripe about Coyote while I was there (other than
> not enough wind inside, of course) was that the restrooms/showers
> were closed half the time. If they can't manage to keep what they
> already have open, why would they be talking about building more?
Obviously their long term ambition is to bring more users to the park. Good
for the park and not bad for us since new users will tend to park in less
windy areas. The park would probably keep our facility open because it would
be regularly used. The other facility would probably depend on use levels and
whether they get a tenant for the concession space. Coyote is really a good
park but the freeway and lack of public transit or a safe bike overcross tend
to isolate it from the rest of the community. There are also plans for
additional sand volleyball courts and a skate park, etc.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 04 2003 - 13:05:53 PDT