Hard, Fast or Slow?

From: Ed Scott (edscott@best.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Wed May 09 2001 - 10:04:15 PDT 

X-OldHeader: From edscott@best.com-DeleteThis.com  Wed May  9 10:04:06 2001
Return-Path: <edscott@best.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA21535 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id KAA17246 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out1.apple.com (mail-out1.apple.com [17.254.0.52]) by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E86235 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed,  9 May 2001 11:04:04 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from apple.com (A17-129-100-225.apple.com [17.129.100.225]) by mail-out1.apple.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA01530 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from scv2.apple.com (scv2.apple.com) by apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id <T536966fd75118164e13e8@apple.com-DeleteThis.com> for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:04:02 -0700
Received: from [17.193.12.114] (scoted.apple.com [17.193.12.114]) by scv2.apple.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA18797 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Wed, 9 May 2001 10:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630)
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 10:04:15 -0700
Subject: Hard, Fast or Slow?
From: Ed Scott <edscott@best.com-DeleteThis.com>
To: Wind Talk <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Message-ID: <B71EC69F.44D1%edscott@best.com-DeleteThis.com>

For anyone using the West System, a query:

On cool California evenings during the summer, do you get better results
with the fast hardener or the slow stuff. Seems like the slow stuff is only
good for daytime use in direct sunlight. The stuff doesn't kick sufficient
for ding repairs at night (55-70 degrees) for 25-30 minutes. If I apply it
to dings before then it runs all over the place, and that's when metering a
tad more than the pump puts out.

Btw, any downside to using a little bit more hardener? I understand it
might make the finished product brittle. Also, when changing hardeners, any
concern about or procedures for cleaning the pump?

So, for best results to get hard do you like it fast or slow? :-)

Thanks.

-Ed

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:10 PST