X-OldHeader: From mchapman@cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis.com Tue Jan 9 15:06:48 2001 Return-Path: <mchapman@cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id PAA23840 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:06:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.58]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id PAA03313 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:06:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from hamachi.synopsys.com (hamachi.synopsys.com [204.176.20.26]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700BF30E for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 16:06:47 -0700 (MST) Received: from crone.synopsys.com (crone.synopsys.com [146.225.7.23]) by hamachi.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27686 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from synopsys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by crone.synopsys.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA25301 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from supernova.cupertino.synopsys.com (supernova [146.225.141.90]) by synopsys.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA09447 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by supernova.cupertino.synopsys.com (8.8.8+Sun/SNPS-Sol2) id PAA17103; Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:06:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 15:06:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200101092306.PAA17103@supernova.cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis.com> From: Matt Chapman <mchapman@cupertino.synopsys.com-DeleteThis.com> To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com Subject: Re: Coyote Point Master Plan and Improvements
I like the shower idea. Removing the poles and nets around the swim
area would be good. Does it make sense to have rentals on the beach
when ASD is right there? That would only hurt their business (unless
they were running it.)
A launch out on the point is intriguing. I've never driven in there
but there's a stretch of land east of the point that looks accessable.
(Everything from the swim area to the point is windshadowed by the
height of the hill and treeline.) What do you do about parking?
http://terraserver.microsoft.com/image.asp?S=10&T=1&X=2800&Y=20802&Z=10&W=2
Maybe you could hold off on your fax a few days to see if there are
other suggestions. Is there a deadline for this submission? This is
the first I've heard of $50k from the builders. BTW, what's the
Coyote Point Master Plan?
Sorry if this is all obvious to others, I've been out of the country.
>
>
>> I wanted to give a list of other uses of
>> funds as well in case the building doesn't fly. I thought of:
>> -a better launch ramp
>> -remove rocks from shallows
>> -outdoor shower near launching areas
>>
>> any others?
>
>Is there any possibility of creating a second launch site on Coyote point
>that is on the West side of the swimming area? This would have the
>advantages of being in clear wind and closer to the Channel. It would be an
>intermediate/expert (no-beginner) type of launch. I'm not too clear on what
>the topography of the land is over there.
>
>BobP
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:04 PST