Return-Path: <mpaunet@ithena.com-DeleteThis> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id LAA00656 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.58]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id LAA20628 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 11:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.businessobjects.com (ns1.businessobjects.com [213.11.117.2]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54199FA for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 12:44:43 -0600 (MDT) Received: from exch-fra-lv04.businessobjects.com (exch-fra-lv04.businessobjects.com [10.6.2.14]) by ns1.businessobjects.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A11371B0 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 18:44:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: by exch-fra-lv04.businessobjects.com.product.businessobjects.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <PMF2R2GH>; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 20:44:28 +0200 Message-ID: <F5FA63116907D411A0D6009027FC8080BA1351@exch-usa-sj04.usa.businessobjects.com-DeleteThis> From: Manuel Paunet <mpaunet@ithena.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis Subject: RE: iws.com Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 20:35:45 +0200 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Go Cathy, kick David's butt! ahah
manu
ps: i like zulusport website so i dont mind
and my screen is big enuff to display everything eheh
-----Original Message-----
From: cathy@remarque.org-DeleteThis [mailto:cathy@remarque.org-DeleteThis]
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 10:57 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: iws.com
My observations about iwindsurf.com:
- It's faster than it was when it launched.
- I haven't noticed any problems with response times.
- zulusports.com is way slower that iwindsurf.com
- However, a lot of one's experience depends on the state of the Internet
and the state of your ISP. iwindsurf.com can't take all the blame
for response issues.
- The wind reports are free. If you really only want a small subset
of info, write your own program to extract the info from the website
and format it however you wish (like in Ken Poulto Poulton's reports).
- I wish iwindsurf.com was around when I started windsurfing! There's
a lot of valuable info there, and I like the fact that it's all in
one place (e.g., local sailing info, directions, local shops).
- I would rather see the zulusports stuff on the page than to see
iwindsurf.com go away.
Cathy
> I too don't like the new zulusports crap.
>
> But, it is only because it moves the wind reading down another inch on the
> myIW page.
>
> I have been using the web site for a week now due to misplaced pager, and
> have not noticed problems with response times, but I seldon go beyond
myIW.
>
> What is do hate, is the new zulucrap banner
>
> Dear iW, lose the zulu crap, or at least put it on the bottom of the page
so
> I don't have to see it.
>
> David
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:43 PDT