Re: progress on 3rd

• Next message: Tracy Pierce: "SFO expansion website?"
• Previous message: Ken Poulton: "progress on 3rd"
• In reply to: Ken Poulton: "progress on 3rd"
• Next in thread: Pierre St. Hilaire: "Re: progress on 3rd"
• Reply: Pierre St. Hilaire: "Re: progress on 3rd"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (sm9237@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA26344 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA139884822; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:33:42 -0800
Received: from tamago.synopsys.com (tamago.synopsys.com [204.176.20.21]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id LAA21593 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:33:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from javelin.synopsys.com (javelin.synopsys.com [146.225.100.38]) by tamago.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA15144 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from synopsys.com (dhcp-146-225-98-217 [146.225.98.217]) by javelin.synopsys.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA18914 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:30:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <385FD54A.33EF990@synopsys.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 11:30:18 -0800
From: Greg Harris <harris@synopsys.com-DeleteThis>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: progress on 3rd
References: <199912210825.AAA15856@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I hate to rain on what looks like a great email... but it's a little
inaccurate. I've talked to BCDC myself and while access improvements are
necessary for FC to move ahead, there are no specific ones at this time, only
ideas. Getting that dirt road back is not a foregone conclusion.

Greg

Ken Poulton wrote:

> >From sfstorm@pacbell.net-DeleteThis Mon Dec 20 23:35:09 1999
> Subject: Re: 3rd ave dirt road
>
> Here comes the Cavalry! Check your snailbox.
>
> The BCDC just weighed-in with a 12/14/99 letter to Foster City's Improvement
> District Senior Civil Engineer stating "no administrative approval to FC 3rd
> Ave. expansion Permit Application M99-31" until they reinstate the
> (Caltrans) dirt parking, provide a new nearby access ramp, bolster one East
> 3rd Ave. ramp parking ("one of the two East 3rd Ave. ramps' parking would be
> eliminated by the expansion", hopefully it's the awkward angled ramp in the
> middle and not the further East wind line bailout ramp with parking?), and
> other access improvements. This is great progress! Any ideas on how we can
> further support the BCDC towards the goal of increasing access to more than
> one hundred organized parking spots?
>
> Great thanks to the teamwork of Greg, Randy, George! This made my day!
>
> -Shawn

• Next message: Tracy Pierce: "SFO expansion website?"
• Previous message: Ken Poulton: "progress on 3rd"
• In reply to: Ken Poulton: "progress on 3rd"
• Next in thread: Pierre St. Hilaire: "Re: progress on 3rd"
• Reply: Pierre St. Hilaire: "Re: progress on 3rd"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:23 PST