Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA023412242; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:57:23 -0700 Return-Path: <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Received: from zonker.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA087422240; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:57:20 -0700 Received: (from poulton@localhost) by zonker.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) id RAA09959 for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:57:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <199910280057.RAA09959@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: Reply-To in Windtalk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
We've been through this discussion before, of course.
The conclusion then was that for a discussion list, setting the default
to reply-only-to-sender causes lots of messages intended for the list to
be essentially lost, and this would happen more than the misdirected
private replies we get now.
Ken wind_talk_meister Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
"Now is the winter of our discontent" -- Richard III, Act I, Scene1, Line 1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:18 PST