Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA020501704; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:48:25 -0700 Return-Path: <mpaunet@businessobjects.com-DeleteThis> Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA081231702; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:48:22 -0700 Received: from ns1.businessobjects.com (ftp.businessobjects.com [194.3.216.37]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id RAA29177 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exch-fra-lv04.businessobjects.com (exch-fra-lv04.businessobjects.com [194.3.216.83]) by ns1.businessobjects.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BA37805 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 02:45:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by exch-fra-lv04.businessobjects.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <4J9XAXXS>; Thu, 28 Oct 1999 02:44:54 +0200 Message-Id: <DDF8255AC466D311A14B0008C7EBBCCB1F883C@EXCH-FRA-LV03> From: Manuel PAUNET <mpaunet@businessobjects.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: RE: Reply-To in Windtalk Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 02:45:34 +0200 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Great idea Rick!
the "landlord" of this site could also use a filter:
if, by chance, there is an invitation for a dinner,
then i would love to receive it ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Cattell [mailto:rcattell@attglobal.net-DeleteThis]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 1999 5:29 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Reply-To in Windtalk
At the risk of starting a non-windurfing-related discussion on
this distribution
list, I've been meaning for some time to request that whoever
owns the wind_talk
server please stop it from tagging a "Reply-To: wind_talk..."
field on outgoing messages.
On the surface this sounds sensible, but over the past year I
don't know how
many messages have gone to ALL of us that were intended only for
one person.
It's just too easy to hit Reply thinking that it's going to the
sender.
Sometimes embarassing, mostly just a waste of everyone's time.
If we want
to do a Reply-All, we all know how to do that.
P.S. If you want to send your input on this to ME ALONE, I'm
happy to collect all
your votes/email and forward it to whoever is in charge... thank
you...
zeev_gur@peoplesoft.com-DeleteThis wrote:
>
> I will be out of the office starting 10/27/99 and will not return until
> 10/29/99.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:18 PST