RE: Sharks in the bay?

From: gandolf@us.ibm.com-DeleteThis
Date: Tue Aug 03 1999 - 13:10:39 PDT


Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA181161162; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:12:43 -0700
Return-Path: <gandolf@us.ibm.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA191611150; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:12:30 -0700
Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (e3.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.103]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id NAA02096 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: gandolf@us.ibm.com-DeleteThis
Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.132.205]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA125034 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:08:15 -0400
Received: from d53mta03h.boulder.ibm.com (d53mta03h.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.142.3]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.8.8m2/NCO v2.04) with SMTP id OAA43242 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:08:33 -0600
Received: by d53mta03h.boulder.ibm.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.4  (830.2 3-23-1999))  id 872567C2.006EA141 ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:08:22 -0600
X-Lotus-Fromdomain: IBMUS
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Message-Id: <872567C2.006EA065.00@d53mta03h.boulder.ibm.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 13:10:39 -0700
Subject: RE: Sharks in the bay?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


They don't wear caps, they wear hats.

"Gerry Mountain" <gry1@pacbell.net-DeleteThis> on 08/03/99 01:01:00 PM

Please respond to wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis

To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
cc:
Subject: RE: Sharks in the bay?

I didn't know that sharks wear caps.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [mailto:wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis]On
> Behalf Of Greg Harris
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 1999 12:35 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: Sharks in the bay?
>
>
>
> Note: it is estimated that there are only about 100 Great Whites
> that patrol
> the entire coast of California and they tend to patrol a lot of it (have a
> large range) which stretches up to Oregon, with some favorite seal stops
> around Ana Nuevo, the Farralons and Bodega and I think breed off
> Tomales and
> the Farralons. Supposedly they also dig the islands off the Santa Barbara
> channel a bit. Most white sharks stay in the deeper waters by the
> Continental Shelf. While I certainly don't think it's outside
> the realm of
> possibility that a Great White might venture down inside the bay
> some (every
> year Gray Whales make the mistake that SF Bay is the way to
> Alaska), I think
> routinely hangin at the third ave channel marker "seal mecca" that it is,
> might be pushing it.
>
> Either you're joking or you should stop shrooming before you sail. When
> someone says they see great whites at third, they're talking
> about the caps.
>
> Greg
>
> JIM PAUGH wrote:
>
> > Great White sharks are very common in the bay, even around 3rd Ave. I've
> > see fins out around the channel marker routinely. It's amazing how much
> > better my gibes are when I see one in the vicinity!
> >
> > --
> > ~jmp Jim Paugh jpaugh@Eng.Sun.COM-DeleteThis
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:35:57 PST