Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA236993945; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:52:25 -0800 Return-Path: <bdow@cisco.com-DeleteThis> Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA192883931; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:52:11 -0800 Received: from mail1.cisco.com (mail1.cisco.com [171.68.225.60]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id OAA04718 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from cisco.com (dhcp-h21-253.cisco.com [171.68.192.253]) by mail1.cisco.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with ESMTP id OAA15671 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:47:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <36B0EA32.98400237@cisco.com-DeleteThis> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 14:52:34 -0800 From: Bob Dow <bdow@cisco.com-DeleteThis> Reply-To: bdow@cisco.com-DeleteThis Organization: Cisco Systems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en]C-CISCOIS (Win95; U) To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Access for Windsurfing, Coyote Crisis References: <70d3040f.36b0c54d@aol.com-DeleteThis> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Does anybody remember when the big building upwind of
Foster City Lagoon was built? I remember the lagoon as being
relatively windy, and it seems dead now, and fluky if
anything. Of course, we have no data . . .
It's scary how much of the access has come under attack
over the last year. I have been thinking (of course, I
haven't done anything about it but write this email)
that if we just stay reactive, then eventually we will
lose.
We don't actually own anything,
like a marina, even though economically as a group
could stand and deliver if we chose to. We expect
the access itself to be free, so we rely on our status
as a "user community" of public facilities to carry the
day, and many of you have put a lot of
time in on this mode, and quite successfully.
There are other areas with smaller windsurfer populations
that can support private launches. Is the cost prohibitive
for the Bay? Maybe the end around is to try to get Bay
frontage included in green belts. (well, brown belts)
Bob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:34:59 PST