SFO Land Manufacturing

• Next message: Kirk Lindstrom: "FIGHT SFO Expansion"
• Previous message: George Haye: "Re: Danger: SFO runway expansion ahead"
• Next in thread: Kirk Lindstrom: "FIGHT SFO Expansion"
• Reply: Kirk Lindstrom: "FIGHT SFO Expansion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA067119708; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 23:41:48 -0800
Return-Path: <sstorm@well.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA176169698; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 23:41:38 -0800
Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.80.6.147]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1/8.9.1/HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id XAA16891 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 23:41:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from speed (macau-57.ppp.hooked.net [206.80.9.249]) by smtp.well.com (8.8.6/8.8.4) with SMTP id XAA15454 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 23:37:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <001701be1846$35721980$f90950ce@speed>
From: "Shawn Storm" <sstorm@well.com-DeleteThis>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: SFO Land Manufacturing
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 23:35:39 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0

Today's TV News had a quote from an SFO airport spokesman that said ~"We are
going to acquire at least 5000 acres from the Bay fill-in project. The
environmentalists won't be happy about it. We are in the process of seeking
plan approval". SFO will create a bird sanctuary to justify the new
pollution! But who can sail on a bird pond?! It would be much better to
expand an Airport near Pleasanton (the old Army base?) where there is space
and this would better support the East Bay sprawl. We must insist that the
Bay wet-real-estate has the same value as other appraised now-dry land, and
is not to be had just for the construction cost. Besides greatly
compromising our mid-bay sailing sites, this poorly conceived expansion will
generate much more freeway congestion, jet noise, and nauseating melting
tires! Please post the address to send our letters to? Let's all work
together to fight this insane plan.

-Shawn

• Next message: Kirk Lindstrom: "FIGHT SFO Expansion"
• Previous message: George Haye: "Re: Danger: SFO runway expansion ahead"
• Next in thread: Kirk Lindstrom: "FIGHT SFO Expansion"
• Reply: Kirk Lindstrom: "FIGHT SFO Expansion"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2013 - 02:03:12 PST