Re: Parking at 3rd, latest guess

From: Ed Scott (edscott@best.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Tue Jul 14 1998 - 13:17:29 PDT


Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (opus-fddi.hpl.hp.com) by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA255418134; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:28:54 -0700
Return-Path: <edscott@shell9.ba.best.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA188338133; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:28:53 -0700
Received: from mail-out2.apple.com (mail-out2.apple.com [17.254.0.51]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6 HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id NAA24034 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate.apple.com (A17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out2.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA13386 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:16:51 -0700
Received: from scv1.apple.com (scv1.apple.com [17.128.100.139]) by mailgate.apple.com (mailgate.apple.com2.0.15) with ESMTP id <B0001176858@mailgate.apple.com-DeleteThis> for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:16:47 -0700
Received: from [17.197.20.103] (scoted2.apple.com [17.197.20.103]) by scv1.apple.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA41958 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:16:43 -0700
Message-Id: <199807142016.NAA41958@scv1.apple.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: Re: Parking at 3rd, latest guess
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:17:29 -0700
X-Sender: edscott@shell9.ba.best.com-DeleteThis
X-Mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, January 22, 1998
From: Ed Scott <edscott@best.com-DeleteThis>
To: "Wind Talk" <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"


>They have the same right to tell you to stay out of their lot and off their
>grass that you have to tell someone to stay out of your driveway and off of
>your lawn.

That's only if there's no public easement there. Most parking strips
adjacent to public roadways are either owned by the county, or the public
and county has an easement there (ingress and egress rights). As most
homeowners know, the adjacent landowner usually has a duty to maintain
that strip and the sidewalk, even though they may not technically own the
underlying land. I'm not sure, but I also don't think they figure into
square footage calculations on the land.

My guess is that the land is privately owned due to its configuration,
but the public has ingress and egress rights due to being next to a
roadway. Couldn't say for sure whether the owner has exclusion rights
without consulting the county recorder, though. I'd be surprised if they
had the right to exclude since there's no sidewalk on that side of the
street.

-Ed



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 05 2013 - 02:01:31 PST