Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA09380; Mon, 24 Jul 1995 18:39:39 -0700 Return-Path: <mchapman@chronologic.com-DeleteThis> Received: from chrono.chronologic.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA220083711; Mon, 24 Jul 1995 15:08:43 -0700 Received: from server.chronologic.com (server.chronologic.com [204.182.5.2]) by chrono.chronologic.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA16435 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 24 Jul 1995 15:00:29 -0700 Received: from diablo.chronologic.com (diablo.chronologic.com [204.182.5.12]) by server.chronologic.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA11377 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Mon, 24 Jul 1995 15:02:06 -0700 From: Matt Chapman <mchapman@chronologic.com-DeleteThis> Received: by diablo.chronologic.com (4.1/Chronologic) id AA03517; Mon, 24 Jul 95 15:02:06 PDT Date: Mon, 24 Jul 95 15:02:06 PDT Reply-To: <mchapman@chronologic.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <9507242202.AA03517@diablo.chronologic.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: San Luis Forebay Status?
> Realizing there's a direct relationship between the water level and
> weeds, can anyone tell me how to interpret the stated water elevation
> (mentioned on the San Luis windtalker) as sailable, or not sailable?
Ken Poulton's info message says the minimum level is 219 ft.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:29:43 PST