Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA21139; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 10:02:01 -0700 Return-Path: <Gregg.Holtmeier@quickmail.llnl.gov-DeleteThis> Received: from popcorn.llnl.gov by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA218145339; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 10:02:19 -0700 Received: from quickmail.llnl.gov by popcorn.llnl.gov (8.6.10/LLNL-2.0) id JAA20663; Thu, 29 Jun 1995 09:56:58 -0700 Message-Id: <n1407702463.25398@quickmail.llnl.gov-DeleteThis> Date: 29 Jun 1995 09:56:59 -0800 From: "Gregg Holtmeier" <Gregg.Holtmeier@quickmail.llnl.gov-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: San Luis weeds yet? To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2
>Has anyone been to San Luis recently? If so, what's the weed situation?
>Is it time for a weed fin yet?
I haven't been there, however, I talked to a guy last night who was there a
few days ago. He said a weed fin is not needed yet.
His speculation was that due to the large runoff, they are moving a lot of
water in and out of the reservoir this year to pump it up the aquaduct to LA
which is keeping the weeds down. I don't know if this is true, however. Anyone
else know more? Gregg Holtmeier.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:29:32 PST