Re: Nuclear 3rd...

From: Gregg Holtmeier (Gregg.Holtmeier@quickmail.llnl.gov-DeleteThis)
Date: Fri Apr 21 1995 - 13:53:25 PDT


Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA10541; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 12:59:12 -0700
Return-Path: <Gregg.Holtmeier@quickmail.llnl.gov-DeleteThis>
Received: from pierce.llnl.gov by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA241664351; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 12:59:11 -0700
Received: from quickmail.llnl.gov by pierce.llnl.gov (8.6.10/LLNL-1.18/llnl.gov-03.95) id MAA05494; Fri, 21 Apr 1995 12:54:32 -0700
Message-Id: <n1413653396.58127@quickmail.llnl.gov-DeleteThis>
Date: 21 Apr 1995 12:53:25 -0800
From: "Gregg Holtmeier" <Gregg.Holtmeier@quickmail.llnl.gov-DeleteThis>
Subject: Re: Nuclear 3rd...
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2


> From: sdubois@advent.com-DeleteThis
> Another nuclear day at 3rd on Thursday. COTW clocked a 31 knots

I got skunked at my local duck pond, Bethany Reservoir, thursday eve east of
Livermore. I saw the SFO reports and didn't feel like making the drive to the
bay.

Bethaney works on the normal thermal generated winds, but I guess these winds
are from the passing front. I'm no meteorolo... uh, weather person, but are
front driven winds more gusty and holey than the thermal generated winds?

Gregg Holtmeier



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:29:07 PST