Re: 3rd ave

From: Jonathan Hahn (hahn@nas.nasa.gov-DeleteThis)
Date: Wed Sep 14 1994 - 15:45:06 PDT 

Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA21103; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 15:48:53 -0700
Return-Path: <hahn@nas.nasa.gov-DeleteThis>
Received: from gigantor.nas.nasa.gov by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA00156; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 15:49:19 -0700
Received: (from hahn@localhost) by gigantor.nas.nasa.gov (8.6.8.1/NAS.5.b) id PAA25146 for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis; Wed, 14 Sep 1994 15:45:06 -0700
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 1994 15:45:06 -0700
From: hahn@nas.nasa.gov-DeleteThis (Jonathan Hahn)
Message-Id: <199409142245.PAA25146@gigantor.nas.nasa.gov-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: 3rd ave

> What scares me most is FC's intention to eventually develop the dump. They'll
> probably try to use that as an excuse to take away the access that's already
> there...

> Ken Brown +\ SnailMail: Hewlett-Packard

That's what scares me too. Who represents the public and public access
to the Bay in these matters? Is it the BCDC? Anyone else? I'd be
willing to get involved to protect our access. I wrote letters during
some of the problems with the current 3rd site and actually got
responses from FC & the BCDC. FC's letter was a joke which as I
remember deflected attention from the issue at hand (access to the Bay)
and raised some spurious issues about how windsurfers should conduct
themselves at the area.

-jon

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:05 PST