X-OldHeader: From jondrums@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com Mon Jun 2 14:46:11 2003 Return-Path: <jondrums@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA00364 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.33]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA15347 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:46:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (law8-oe60.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.195]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E65DB15EAA for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:46:10 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:46:10 -0700 Received: from 63.200.129.67 by law8-oe60.law8.hotmail.com with DAV; Mon, 02 Jun 2003 21:46:10 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [63.200.129.67] X-Originating-Email: [jondrums@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com] From: "Jon Wagner" <jondrums@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com> To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> References: <2639547.1054586855120.JavaMail.root@172.16.100.50-DeleteThis.com> Subject: Re: Boom Question Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 14:46:10 -0700 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <Law8-OE60qR77bieLYC0000ac33@hotmail.com-DeleteThis.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2003 21:46:10.0787 (UTC) FILETIME=[61965330:01C32950]
Anyone wanna buy a well used HPL carbon boom?
Length: 4'7" - 6'3" (140-190cm)
Weight: 2.32kg/5.1LB
Best offer ($175?). As I said, well used, however absolutely nothing wrong
with it. I live down south in mountain view.
Jon
> >As someone who owned both Fiberspar and HPL in the wave size (used
> it >with 3.5 to 5.8 wave sails) I can attest that HPL is a MUCH MUCH
> MUCH >nicer boom. The sails rigged on HPL felt more solid, rigid if
> you >will, like a wing. > >Durability-wise, I broke the Fiberspar
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 26 2005 - 11:56:50 PST