Audit criticizes S.F. Airport on runway plan

From: Kirk Lindstrom (KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 07:02:47 PDT 

X-OldHeader: From KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com  Fri May 23 07:01:26 2003
Return-Path: <KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id HAA10232 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 23 May 2003 07:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.33]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id HAA26226 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 23 May 2003 07:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.12]) by msgbas1x.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E2917AFD for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 23 May 2003 08:01:25 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from user-vcaum54.dsl.mindspring.com ([216.175.88.164] helo=ix.netcom.com) by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19JD6r-0000mb-00 for wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com; Fri, 23 May 2003 07:01:25 -0700
Message-ID: <3ECE2A06.6040706@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 07:02:47 -0700
From: Kirk Lindstrom <KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: windtalk <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Subject: Audit criticizes S.F. Airport on runway plan

I put the whole story here
http://www.suite101.com/mypage.cfm/Windsurfing/21662

Summary:
"San Francisco International Airport's $75 million effort to expand its
runways focused too heavily on marketing the idea, spent too lavishly on
consultants and failed to give equal weight to alternatives to paving
San Francisco Bay, according to a highly critical audit of the project
released Wednesday." 

-- 
best regards
Kirk Lindstrom
Editor: "Investing & Personal Finance" @ Suite101.com 
http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/investing

Please Try My Newsletter: http://www.suite101.com/files/topics/270/files/WhatLetter2Buy.html

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 26 2005 - 11:56:48 PST