(no subject)

From: Jarrett McPeek (jumpjibe@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 14:03:45 PDT


X-OldHeader: From jumpjibe@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com  Thu Oct 11 14:03:47 2001
Return-Path: <jumpjibe@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA28514 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.33]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id OAA11801 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ws2-7.us4.outblaze.com (205-158-62-82.outblaze.com [205.158.62.82]) by msgbas1.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5398F2E91 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:03:46 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (qmail 16540 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Oct 2001 21:03:45 -0000
Message-ID: <20011011210345.16537.qmail@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
Received: from ws2-7.us4.outblaze.com for [170.20.143.204] via web-mailer on Fri, 12 Oct 2001 05:03:45 +0800
From: "Jarrett McPeek" <jumpjibe@earthlink.net-DeleteThis.com>
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 05:03:45 +0800
Subject: Re:


Well I have mixed experiences with them. First, I find them comfortable and fairly well designed in that regard. Durability-wise, I'm on my second (in 3 years). The first held up fine (with a lot of use), and I even sold it after a couple years. The one I'm using now is holding up noticeabley less well, with a few minor rips and tears after just a few sessions.
JM
  
-----Original Message-----
From: "Erik Eiseman" <eeiseman@worldnet.att.net-DeleteThis.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 12:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>
Subject:

> Does anyone have a smoothy Neil Pryde wetsuit. I'm on my second
> one. The first one was warrenty replaced after mysterious tears
> formed in the rubber. not cuts. mostly by the crotch. Now my
> second one is even worse. Be weary of purchasing neil pryde
> wetsuits. they don't seem to work. Now I just have a heap of
> useless rubber after one season.
>
> curious if anyone else has had these problems with NP.
>
> E
>
>
> [HTML file part2 deleted by listprocessor]
>
>

-- 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:22 PST