Eastshore Park - Access

From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com
Date: Fri Sep 14 2001 - 12:11:24 PDT


X-OldHeader: From Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com  Fri Sep 14 12:11:28 2001
Return-Path: <Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id MAA07517 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com
Received: from msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (msgbas2.cos.agilent.com [192.168.148.34]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id MAA10246 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 12:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imo-r05.mx.aol.com (imo-r05.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.101]) by msgbas2.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5395B1887 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 13:11:27 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com by imo-r05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id v.84.1b60707f (30965) for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:11:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <84.1b60707f.28d3b05c@aol.com-DeleteThis.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 15:11:24 EDT
Subject: Eastshore Park - Access
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 40


Please check out this letter from Paul Kamen re. our chance to have or not
have access in the East Bay:

An Open Letter to the Paddling, Rowing, Windsurfing, and Sailing Communities

Monday, September 24, 2001
Please put this date in your calendar. It is probably the most important date
ever in the history of the Berkeley Waterfront. Monday September 24 is the
date of the first public workshop to determine appropriate uses for most of
the shoreline between the Bay Bridge and Richmond.

There is consensus that most of the shoreline and tidelands will be preserved
as open space and wildlife habitat. Emeryville Crescent, the Hoffman Mash,
the creek outflows, and other sensitive tidal flats are quite safe. At issue
is the degree to which human recreation will be supported along other areas
of the shoreline, areas which have less ecological importance but offer
perfect opportunities for various types of small craft operation.

If the plans put forth by the Sierra Club and Audubon Society are adopted,
the Eastshore State Park will be a great place to look at the water - but
you'll have to go elsewhere if you want to touch it or float on it.

The meeting is Monday, September 24, at 7:00 PM at Hs. Lordships Restaurant,
Berkeley Marina, in the upstairs banquet room. This room holds 600 people,
and the workshop organizers hope to fill it up.

Previous "workshops" have really just been presentation and comment sessions.
This time, the plan is to break the participants into groups of probably
about ten people per group, and go through a three step process using
large-scale maps. Participants will be asked to:

1) Estimate the "carrying capacity" of each section of the park.
2) Determine appropriate uses consistent with carrying capacity.
3) Propose improvements and facilities to support those uses.

If State Parks (the owner) and East Bay Regional (the operator) do the right
thing, this park could provide some amazing opportunities for entry-level
rowing, kayaking, small boat sailing, windsurfing, and possibly even a
permanent dragon boat facility or an outrigger club.

We could have on-site storage for kayaks and sailboards at the best launch
sites. We could have youth programs offering dragon boat practice every day
after school. We could have rental rowboats for the one-time visitor. We
could have sensible parking lots near the launch sites where they're needed,
with bathrooms and showers.

At issue here is the role we see for water-borne recreation in an urban
setting: Is it something we should have at our doorstep? Or is it something
we should have to drive a great distance to find, in a vehicle large enough
to carry our gear? Should a State Park support non-profit clubs with strong
public service components? Or is the commercial monopoly concession their
only business model?

As much as I dislike taking positions that oppose the Sierra Club, I think
the Club has the environmental interests of the region on backwards in this
case. Close-in recreation, especially recreation involving small
non-motorized boats, has an environmental and social value that is going
unrecognized by the Sierra Club and by the planners and advocates who seem to
be in control. There is real danger that we'll end up with a waterfront that
relates to the water in name only, with no way to actually do anything
involving boats.

We can change this. Please attend the workshop on September 24, and take part
in shaping this new waterfront park.

For more background, see the letter archived at
www.well.com/user/pk/waterfront/ESP-OpenLetter-1.html
and other documents pertaining to the Eastshore State Park at
www.well.com/user/pk/waterfront/ESP.html

My response to the article in the August issue of the Sierra Club Yodeler is
at
www.well.com/user/pk/waterfront/EastshoreStatePark/YodelerResponse.html

Meanwhile, walk the site and use your imagination, and I'll see you at the
workshop on Monday September 24.

Paul Kamen
Chair, Berkeley Waterfront Commission
pk@well.com-DeleteThis.com 510-540-7968
www.BerkeleyWaterfront.org
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:21 PST