Re: [SFBAeNetwork] Save The Bay phones 6/11-12 re SFO

From: daddy@ilovemaggie.co.uk-DeleteThis.com
Date: Mon Jun 11 2001 - 09:28:10 PDT

Next message: Jonathan Hahn: "Carpet for 3rd"
Previous message: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: [SFBAeNetwork] Save The Bay phones 6/11-12 re SFO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: daddy@ilovemaggie.co.uk-DeleteThis.com
Message-ID: <7248645.992276891075.JavaMail.root@smtp.backend.another.com-DeleteThis.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:28:10 +0100 (BST)
To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com
Subject: Re: [SFBAeNetwork] Save The Bay phones 6/11-12 re SFO

I got to demo a bunch of boards this weekend...man those reps have
hard jobs! write-off everything and sail every day. -----Original
Message----- From : Kirk Lindstrom <KirkLindstrom@ix.netcom.com-DeleteThis.com> To
: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK
<wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com> Date : 08 June 2001 23:48:58
Subject : Re: [SFBAeNetwork] Save The Bay phones 6/11-12 re SFO

>What happened to the idea of a high speed train to LA to handle all
these short >trips? > >Tracy Pierce wrote: > >> Peter, thanks for
the link to the FAA reports. I've read only the Executive >>
Summary so far, but judging from that, the only hope for beating
SFO's wish >> to fill the bay is to sell the idea of better airport
locations! The FAA >> says new technology could improve poor
weather landing rates by 3%. I >> noticed that OAK doesn't even
make it onto the list of frequent-delay >> airports (while HON
does?!), and OAK sure seems to be a lot more centrally >> located
where the bay area at large is concerned, so that would be my >>
choice. I wish it were my choice! >> >> Curiously, the
concentration of flights near 10:00am is said to be a >> positive
thing with benefits mentioned, to the effect of providing >>
flexibility. That sure shoots the idea of 'always on time' down the
tubes, >> though! So the 'factual numbers' we see in the news are
virtually always >> just whatever numbers are needed to support the
writer's opinion, right? >> >> Keep up your great work, Peter! >>
>> Tracy >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From:
wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com >> >
[mailto:wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com]On Behalf Of
Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com >> > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:37 AM >> >
To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK >> > Subject: Re:
[SFBAeNetwork] Save The Bay phones 6/11-12 re SFO >> > >> > >> > >>
> In a message dated 6/7/2001 7:43:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, >> >
TPierce@goldengate.org-DeleteThis.com writes: >> > >> > > While the overall hourly
landing average looks very nice compared to the >> > > peak foul
weather landing rate, that's apples vs oranges. What's the >> peak
>> > > landing rate in good weather? >> > >> > For the 15 peak
hours the hourly rates run from 19 to 45 with three hours >> > over
40 and 12 hours at 36 or less. It's apples and oranges unless they
>> put >> > on some controls to sread the demand out. The airport
claims the clear >> > weather capacity for arrivals is 60/hour but
FAA found that 50/hour is the >> >> > real world answer. >> > >> >
The really interesting issue comes out when you look at 15 minute >>
segments. >> > There are 20 planes scheduled to arrive between 9:45
and 10:00 a.m. even >> > though the maximum arrivals is 12.5 per 15
minutes. There is only one >> plane >> > scheduled to arrive
between 10:30 and 10:45. >> > >> > The FAA report is available at:
http://www.faa.gov/events/benchmarks/ > >-- >best regards >Kirk
Lindstrom >Editor: ?Kirk's Investing & Personal Finance? @
Suite101.com >http://www.suite101.com/welcome.cfm/investing >and
?Kirk's Online Newsletter?
>http://www.suite101.com/files/topics/270/files/WhatLetter2Buy.html
> > >

-----

Be passionate about your email Just click here: http://another.com

Next message: Jonathan Hahn: "Carpet for 3rd"
Previous message: Kirk Lindstrom: "Re: [SFBAeNetwork] Save The Bay phones 6/11-12 re SFO"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:13 PST