X-OldHeader: From rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com Fri Apr 27 15:29:23 2001 Return-Path: <rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com> Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com [130.29.244.179]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id PAA29270 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:29:23 -0700 (PDT) From: rossb@WellsFargo.COM-DeleteThis.com Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com [130.29.152.59]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id PAA20757 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:29:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yridian.wellsfargo.com (yridian.wellsfargo.com [204.151.114.19]) by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C71B40E for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:29:22 -0600 (MDT) Received: from unixm7.wellsfargo.com (unixm7.wellsfargo.com [10.88.15.244]) by yridian.wellsfargo.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f3RMW2A00907 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xcgi-casfo-01.wellsfargo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by unixm7.wellsfargo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA19723 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:29:19 -0500 (CDT) Received: by xcgi-casfo-01.wellsfargo.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <JSFN8FYC>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:29:18 -0700 Message-ID: <583643968681D4119D170001FA7EEA8102E7F75F@xcem-casfo-04.wellsfargo.com-DeleteThis.com> To: wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis.com Subject: RE: Eastshore Report? Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:29:14 -0700 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
This meeting went better than I had expected. I had been warned that there
was a "no cars" contingent, but the only "no cars" people who spoke were
really against the spill-over free way traffic. Non windsurfers spoke up
about the need for parking, for everyone from fishermen, kayakers,
picnickers, and windsurfers (try carrying your fishing pole and your cooler
on the bus, he said). Someone put in his vote for a launch off the south
tip of the Albany bulb. (The bulb is a pretty small place, and I personally
don't see parking near the end of it working out. The road out there that
he mentioned is a wide flat path that a single car could get down most of
the way. The gravel beach he mentioned, I've never seen, and I've walked
around the bulb several times, even done an emergency landing there in the
vicinity of the proposed launch. I'll go again and check it out--see if I
can find his beach.) There were the usual people complaining about water
quality--wrong venue! The most interesting part for me was to see that
there are regular attendees for meetings like this. The chair person knew
by name many of the audience who got up to speak! In all, I think maybe six
windsurfers spoke. Some of us non-speakers made "we want launch spots"
comments for the comments box. My comment emphasized the relatively safe
aspect of the central bay east shore for windsurfing as the (prevailing)
wind and waves push you back to shore.
Cindoll
-----Original Message-----
From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com [mailto:Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 2:29 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list WIND_TALK
Subject: Eastshore Report?
Any reports from the Eastshore Park meeting last night?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 02:10:10 PST