RE: pager reading at Coyote and 3rd

From: Earl Armas (eaarmas@cisco.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2000 - 07:43:27 PDT


Return-Path: <eaarmas@cisco.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from opus.labs.agilent.com (root@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id HAA00313 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cosrel2.hp.com (cosrel2.hp.com [15.88.200.10]) by opus.labs.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 AgilentLabs Workstation) with ESMTP id HAA29354 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.69.43.88]) by cosrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687D4212 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:40:09 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from mira-sjcd-1.cisco.com (mira-sjcd-1.cisco.com [171.69.43.44]) by sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA25715 for <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:40:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eaarmasnt1 (dhcp-171-69-59-115.cisco.com [171.69.59.115]) by mira-sjcd-1.cisco.com (Mirapoint) with SMTP id ABL22887; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: <eaarmas@cisco.com-DeleteThis>
From: "Earl Armas" <eaarmas@cisco.com-DeleteThis>
To: <wind_talk@opus.labs.agilent.com-DeleteThis>
Subject: RE: pager reading at Coyote and 3rd
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:43:27 -0700
Message-ID: <NDBBJNCGBKNCAOANIJOJOECPCGAA.eaarmas@cisco.com-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <200006290745.AAA07356@proxy4.ba.best.com-DeleteThis>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300


 
> As for Tuesday's readings, I'd say the Coyote readings were a bit high
> for the inside, but accurate for the outside. I think sometimes there
> truly are large differentials between the two sites. Usually the closer
> you usually are to the gap means more wind, which makes it all the more
> important to oppose runway expansion.

I agree with Ed here. I was out Tuesday and it was somewhat high on the
graph. I was out on Sunday also (classic Coyote - consistent winds and
warm and crowded) and the graph appeared to be right on (felt the same
both Tues and Sun).

E



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:24 PDT