Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com (root@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.176]) by jr.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA28747 for <wind_talk_ls@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:03:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com (hplms26.hpl.hp.com [15.255.168.31]) by opus.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA15305 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imo16.mx.aol.com (imo16.mx.aol.com [152.163.225.6]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id KAA14419 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis by imo16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id 1.20.4676a8b (6963); Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:59:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20.4676a8b.2624b3e7@aol.com-DeleteThis> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 12:59:19 EDT Subject: Re: FW: Sail Tomales Bay To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis, SMTP:stbcom@spire.com-DeleteThis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows sub 54
In a message dated 4/11/00 9:30:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time, bob@quake.net-DeleteThis
writes:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanton Morris [SMTP:stbcom@spire.com-DeleteThis]
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 9:03 AM
> To: webmaster@sfba.org-DeleteThis
> Subject: Sail Tomales Bay
>
> SFBA:
>
> I am building a noncommercial web site (www.sailtomalesbay.com) about
> sailing on Tomales Bay. I noticed that SFBA has been instrumental in
> preserving the Grassy Point sailboard site. Do you have any
> observations you would like to contribute about sailing on Tomales Bay?
> I am particularly interested in access problems of board sailors. Would
> SFBA be an appropriate link to add to www.sailtomalesbay.com?
>
> Why am I doing this? Both Grassy Point and the Marconi "beach cat"
> sites have "For Sale" signs on them. I would like to see those changed
> to "For Sail" signs.
> Thank you.
>
> Stanton Morris
>
The last I heard the supervisor of the National Park told me that they were
working on the acquisition of Grassy Point. They were waiting for appraisal
information to come back. I encouraged him in the effort to purchase the land
and stressed the recreational value which might not be indicated in a
traditional appraisal. He indicated that they would most likely leave the
access as is rather than messing around with trails and bathrooms and the
requirement for more service and maintenance. We have not preserved Grassy
Point yet, but I am optimistic. I haven't made an effort on Marconi and I
don't expect it is the type of parcel that the NPS would want, but maybe the
State Park would be interested in conjunction with the conference center
which I think is State owned?
Peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:24:04 PDT