Re: re Reply Addressees (was Re: subscribe digest)

From: Ken Poulton (poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis)
Date: Fri Nov 05 1999 - 14:37:25 PST

Next message: Michael Schonberg: "Not read: Toxins in our coastal waterways"
Previous message: Martin Frankel: "Re: re Reply Addressees"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 14:37:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Message-Id: <199911052237.OAA29166@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re:  re Reply Addressees (was Re: subscribe digest)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I agree with CINDOLL, "Something's changed." Using M$ LookOutExpress
> (sorry, no choice for the moment), hitting "Reply to all" now gets me two
> addressees, which are
> "wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis"
> AND
> "Multiple recpients of list"
> which is of course the same email address.
>
> We all know M$ Outlook thinks it's a lot smarter than it really is, but
> isn't there a way to make this work nicely?

I don't think anything significant has changed at the listserv. I'll bet
on LookOutExpress being new or changing. I enclose two messages,
one from today and one from 1994.

Ken Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis

"Imagine if every Thursday your shoes exploded if you tied them the
usual way. This happens to us all the time with computers, and nobody
thinks of complaining."
-- Jeff Raskin, interviewed in Doctor Dobb's Journal

    From listserv@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Fri Nov 5 07:07:34 1999
    Received: from jr.hpl.hp.com (listserv@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis [15.0.168.206])
            by zonker.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id HAA03944
            for <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 07:07:34 -0800 (PST)
    Received: by jr.hpl.hp.com
            (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA122614441; Fri, 5 Nov 1999 07:07:21 -0800
    Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 07:07:21 -0800
    Message-Id: <001001bf279d$eabdf6d0$6e030a0a@goldengate.org-DeleteThis>
    Errors-To: listserv_err@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
    Reply-To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
    Originator: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
    Sender: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
    Precedence: bulk
    From: "Tracy Pierce" <ktpierce@hooked.net-DeleteThis>
    To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
    Subject: re Reply Addressees (was Re: subscribe digest)
    X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
    X-Comment: Windsurfing Discussion Mailing List
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Content-Type: text/plain;
    Status: R

    I agree with CINDOLL, "Something's changed." Using M$ LookOutExpress
    (sorry, no choice for the moment), hitting "Reply to all" now gets me two
    addressees, which are
    "wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis"
    AND
    "Multiple recpients of list"
    which is of course the same email address.

We all know M$ Outlook thinks it's a lot smarter than it really is, but
isn't there a way to make this work nicely?

Tracy (email dummy) Pierce

    From listserv@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Wed Apr 27 19:44 PDT 1994
    Received: from jr-fddi.hpl.hp.com by zonker.hpl.hp.com with SMTP
            (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA11687; Wed, 27 Apr 1994 19:44:21 -0700
    Return-Path: <listserv@jr.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
    Received: by jr.hpl.hp.com
            (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA22717; Wed, 27 Apr 1994 19:44:24 -0700
    Date: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 19:44:24 -0700
    Message-Id: <9404280233.AA00750@usc.com-DeleteThis>
    Comment: Windsurfing Discussion Mailing List
    Originator: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
    Errors-To: poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
    Reply-To: <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
    Sender: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
    Version: 5.41 -- Copyright (c) 1991/92, Anastasios Kotsikonas
    From: Will Estes <westes@usc.com-DeleteThis>
    To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
    Subject: Re: Need a measuring site for Coyote and Third Avenue
    Status: R

'Ken Poulton says:'
> > To get to the point: I need help from Bay Area windsurfers locating some
> > buildings where we can install a sensor for Coyote and for Third Ave.
>
> I think this is an erroneous starting point. The only buildings that
> will give really good readings are the piers downwind of the runways and
> the San Mateo Bridge. Any building on the shore south of the airport
> is *usually* inside the wind line (that, is, out of the wind).

I think it depends a lot on elevation as well, though. I mentioned the

Next message: Michael Schonberg: "Not read: Toxins in our coastal waterways"
Previous message: Martin Frankel: "Re: re Reply Addressees"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:19 PST