IMCS vs MCS (was Re:460 Mast For Sale)

From: Tracy Pierce (ktpierce@hooked.net-DeleteThis)
Date: Wed Sep 22 1999 - 14:10:13 PDT 

Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA185724970; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:16:10 -0700
Return-Path: <ktpierce@hooked.net-DeleteThis>
Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA125814961; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:16:01 -0700
Received: from wenet.net (tod.wenet.net [216.64.144.163]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id OAA13695 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hooked.net (hidden-user@proxy19.ggbhtd.dst.ca.us-DeleteThis [199.88.72.19]) by wenet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA07225 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <37E945B5.9303D419@hooked.net-DeleteThis>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:10:13 -0700
From: Tracy Pierce <ktpierce@hooked.net-DeleteThis>
Reply-To: ktpierce@hooked.net-DeleteThis
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: IMCS vs MCS (was Re:460 Mast For Sale)
References: <37E93285.8C4DFACC@hooked.net-DeleteThis>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sorry about my fat fingers, wind_talk folks, that was intended for Steve
only. But since it garnered some interest, let's change this to IMCS vs
MCS...

Re "I'm assuming the 27 rating is MCS, cuz the IMCS rating on all four of
the above is 25." (those being North Xcellerator VIPERs(2) & 80 & 60),

Martin writes "For a 460 mast, IMCS == MCS by definition.".

This has probably been discussed into the ground already, but What IS the
definition of each?

Thanx

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:36:11 PST