Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA098224915; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 21:21:56 -0700 Return-Path: <Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis> Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA274924902; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 21:21:43 -0700 Received: from imo11.mx.aol.com (imo11.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.1]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.9.1a/HPL-PA Relay) with ESMTP id VAA29811 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Fri, 30 Jul 1999 21:21:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis Received: from Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis by imo11.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v22.4.) id 1ZVAa07549 (4200) for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 00:17:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <bc6d33cc.24d3d2c7@aol.com-DeleteThis> Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 00:17:11 EDT Subject: Re: Developer Back with Revision on Coyote Point To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 22
In a message dated 7/30/99 11:59:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time, jmilum@saba.com-DeleteThis
writes:
> Do you anticipate that it would be beneficial or needed for a large quantity
> of windsurfers to attend this meeting? Or is this a different kind of
> meeting where quantity of opinion at this meeting will or won't have a
> significant impact?
I don't think we need a large body count but it will be good to have at least
a handfull of us there to show that we are going to follow through all the
way. It doesn't look like there should be any votes or decisions made. I
assume that if the revised plan seems like something the palanning commission
would consider, then they will calendar a regular meeting and probably ask
the city planner to pass the revisions on to the environmental consultant for
evaluation.
Peter
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:35:56 PST