Received: from opus.hpl.hp.com by jr.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA198613435; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:23:56 -0700 Return-Path: <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Received: from zonker.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.24/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA297563433; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:23:53 -0700 Received: (from poulton@localhost) by zonker.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.7.1) id VAA04191 for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 21:23:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <199906170423.VAA04191@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: SJ Mercury Article on SFO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Any comments from others on what is most successful strategy to use at
> these meetings?
>
> All talk, elect a representative to talk????
A good strategy is to have one person be the official representive
from the SFBA to show that there is a group of many people
being represented. Then have as many other windsurfers talk as
want to. Each should try to *briefly* talk about some aspect
that has not been addressed yet. Everyone there is happier
when you avoid repetition.
Ken "been to way too many city meetings lately" Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:35:42 PST