Coyote Point Timeline

From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis
Date: Tue May 25 1999 - 13:51:00 PDT

Next message: zeev_gur@peoplesoft.com-DeleteThis: "releasable foot straps?"
Previous message: Peter Liu: "Re: Coyote Point Update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: Eyes4Hire@aol.com-DeleteThis
Message-Id: <98a6e261.247c6734@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:51:00 EDT
Subject: Coyote Point Timeline
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis, atomic1@worldnet.att.net-DeleteThis, harris@synopsys.com-DeleteThis, bob@quake.net-DeleteThis, geohaye@hotmail.com-DeleteThis, Randyboz@aol.com-DeleteThis, karinaoc@earthlink.net-DeleteThis, Robberson.Bill@epamail.epa.gov-DeleteThis, OConnor.Karina@epamail.epa.gov-DeleteThis, harris4life@yahoo.com-DeleteThis, CoyoteSurf@aol.com-DeleteThis, bdow@cisco.com-DeleteThis, TFeldstein@grmslaw.com-DeleteThis, mtischler@mail.arc.nasa.gov-DeleteThis, lbauman@fostercity.org-DeleteThis, jrunge@netcom.com-DeleteThis, jmcgrath@portoakland.com-DeleteThis, lstanley@stanleyrose.com-DeleteThis, ErikRog@aol.com-DeleteThis, pyliu@earthlink.net-DeleteThis, buck@velaresorts.com-DeleteThis, RedKen2@aol.com-DeleteThis, WindyYet@aol.com-DeleteThis, AIRBOYD1@aol.com-DeleteThis, david@windcall.com-DeleteThis, cort@larnedwindsurf.com-DeleteThis, USWA@aol.com-DeleteThis, windsurf@accesstoledo.com-DeleteThis (Rod Clevenger), nancyc@accesstoledo.com-DeleteThis, mlhyde@san.rr.com-DeleteThis (MaryLynn Hyde)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The next Planning Commission hearing regarding the 301 Airport Boulevard
development is tentatively scheduled for Monday, June 14th. If that meeting
is to go forward, they must give public notice by Friday, June 4th. I will
send out the word on June 4th as to whether the meeting has been delayed or
not.

When the issue comes before the Commission it will be up for approval. The
Commissioners can either Accept, Deny, or Deny Without Prejudice.

If they Accept whatever the developer has brought back at that time they may
still put additional conditions on the project at their discretion.

If they Deny Without Prejudice, they are essentially saying they do not like
what they see, but they are leaving the door open for the developer to make
modifications which might make the project conform to what they would be
willing to approve. The developer would likely return to the Planning
Commission with the project at some later date following a Denial Without
Prejudice.

If they they issue a flat out denial there is a likelyhood that the developer
would appeal the denial to the City Council. The developer would have 7 days
to appeal and the Council would deal with scheduling the appeal hearing at
their next session.

Whatever modifications the developer makes will likely be evaluated in the
Planning Department Staff Report which would be released June 10th. Once I
get my hands on that report, I will sent out the word as to the
modifiacations if any and the City Planners recommendation. In the meantime,
those who wish to comment need to reserve June 14th @ 6:00 pm. The Planning
Commission meets at Burlingame City Hall- 501 Primrose, Burlingame.

Written comments may be sent to the City Planner, but any comments on or
after June 10th (when the new information on any modifications comes out) are
not likely to reach the Commissioners before they take up the matter on June
14th. As such, more specific comments about the proposed developement will
need to be made at the Planning Commission meeting.

Comment letter may be sent to:

Meg Monroe
Planning Director
City of Burlingame
501 Primrose Street
Burlingame, CA 94010

Next message: zeev_gur@peoplesoft.com-DeleteThis: "releasable foot straps?"
Previous message: Peter Liu: "Re: Coyote Point Update"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:35:34 PST