Re: Dogs at 3rd

From: gandolf@us.ibm.com-DeleteThis
Date: Thu May 06 1999 - 08:30:16 PDT

Next message: Zeev_Gur/PeopleSoft@peoplesoft.com-DeleteThis: "Wed at Crissy"
Previous message: Ken Poulton: "RE: Dogs at 3rd"
Maybe in reply to: Jay Runge: "Dogs at 3rd"
Next in thread: Gerald Mountain: "RE: Dogs at 3rd"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

From: gandolf@us.ibm.com-DeleteThis
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Message-Id: <87256769.00552CA6.00@d53mta03h.boulder.ibm.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 09:30:16 -0600
Subject: Re: Dogs at 3rd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Stiffest booms: I'd have to say Fiberspar carbon. But when you're on small stuff
( < 5.0m ) I haven't noticed much differance between them and Chinook (although
I'm sure I'll get chastised for that one). Durable: Fiberspar has gotten much
better. I know people who used to bread 1 or 2 a year. Now they're lasting 2 or
3 years. I had a Chinook that lasted me about 3 1/2 season and finally
cracked...and I sailed it hard. If you're going with a big sail, I'd got with
the Fiberspar.

But the BIG difference is price: Chinook: about $150. Fiberspar carbon: $450
(Ouch!!!!!)

Greg

"Don Brennen" <windguy@jps.net-DeleteThis> on 05/05/99 09:54:19 PM

Please respond to wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis

To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
cc: (bcc: Greg Gavalakis/Mountain View/IBM)
Subject: Re: Dogs at 3rd

I love dogs, especially mine that I leave at home. If the regular dogs
would just leave their cars and golf clubs at home, we all would have a lot
less to complain about.

And who makes the best booms (stiffest & most durable), I want to know?

Don

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Morse <Jon@livetoplay.com-DeleteThis>
To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
Date: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 11:12 AM
Subject: RE: Dogs at 3rd

>ditto
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: randlecl [mailto:randlecl@pacbell.net-DeleteThis]
>Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 1999 8:54 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list
>Subject: Re: Dogs at 3rd
>
>
>sometimes i like the four leggeds at 3rd better than the two leggeds...
>
>thanks jay
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jay Runge <jrunge@netcom.com-DeleteThis>
>To: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>
>Date: Tuesday, May 04, 1999 12:48 PM
>Subject: Dogs at 3rd
>
>
>>3rd avenue and Pt Isabel are dog friendly windsurf locations.
>>
>>If you really don't like dogs, there are other spots that are dog
>unfriendly.
>>Coyote Pt and Berkely Marina are both unfriendly to dogs, so you will
>never
>>hear barking or have to break up a dog fight.
>>
>>Please don't call the dog catcher. Have you ever talked to a
>dogcatcher?
>>If you really have a dog problem, come see me first (sigh).
>>
>>Jay
>>
>>PS
>>When this thread started I heard two interesting observations:
>>
>>If you stay out in the channel and just keep RIPPING, you can't hear
>the
>>dogs. Seems that you can only hear them when you are close to shore.
>>
>>You have been rigging next to those dog owners for years, you might
>consider
>>asking their names. Then it wouldn't be 'that damn barking dog' it
>would
>>be 'Barney's damn barking dog'. Might be better.
>>
>

Next message: Zeev_Gur/PeopleSoft@peoplesoft.com-DeleteThis: "Wed at Crissy"
Previous message: Ken Poulton: "RE: Dogs at 3rd"
Maybe in reply to: Jay Runge: "Dogs at 3rd"
Next in thread: Gerald Mountain: "RE: Dogs at 3rd"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:35:24 PST