Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.18/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA010669423; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 11:03:43 -0700 Return-Path: <bilbo@aic1.accesscom.com-DeleteThis> Received: from ns2.accesscom.com (ns2.accesscom.com [205.226.156.3]) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.6 HPLabs Relay) with ESMTP id LAA29238 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 11:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aic1.accesscom.com (bilbo@aic1.accesscom.com-DeleteThis [205.226.156.10]) by ns2.accesscom.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12558 for <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 10:55:13 -0700 Received: (from bilbo@localhost) by aic1.accesscom.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id KAA21602; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 10:55:12 -0700 Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Bilbo Innovations, Inc." <bilbo@bilbo.com-DeleteThis> X-Sender: bilbo@aic1.accesscom.com-DeleteThis To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Cc: Multiple recipients of list <wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Subject: Re: ASD vs Mistral In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970917102222.28013D-100000@telemark.stanford.edu-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.3.90.970917104826.19730D-100000@aic1.accesscom.com-DeleteThis> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, Booker Bense wrote:
> - Argh... I knew that one wouldn't slip by.
>
> On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, JMILUM.US.ORACLE.COM wrote:
>
> > When analyzing durability you have to divide durability into two seperate
> > categories.
> >
Guys,
I appreciate your input about durability. It is very important.
But my primary concern was about performance and ease of use. My old
Mistral is dying and there is no wind :-( to try ASD. And after all, you need
time to get used to a new board.
Well, are ASDs faster?
Point sharper?
Easier to jibe?
Carve sharper turns?
Stay stable in the turn?
Easier to jump?
Harder to break a foot :-) ?
Deliver more fun?
Sergei
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:32:44 PST