Re: Why it blows at Sherman (second take)

From: TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis
Date: Thu Jul 17 1997 - 23:03:05 PDT 

Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.18/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA022016002; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 23:06:43 -0700
Return-Path: <TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from emout01.mail.aol.com (emout01.mx.aol.com) by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA129196002; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 23:06:42 -0700
Received: (from root@localhost) by emout01.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0) id CAA00401 for wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 02:03:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 02:03:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: TWavo@aol.com-DeleteThis
Message-Id: <970718020304_-1124765931@emout01.mail.aol.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: Why it blows at Sherman (second take)

In a message dated 7/17/97 7:11:25 PM, you wrote:

<<Physics....no such thing as suction (when explaining forces)>>

Ah HA !!
But see, as you said yourself sometimes the wind does suck.
TD

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:32:15 PST