Re: Save 3rd Ave

From: WindFinder@aol.com-DeleteThis
Date: Thu Apr 20 1995 - 07:25:18 PDT


Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA04462; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 07:29:04 -0700
Return-Path: <WindFinder@aol.com-DeleteThis>
Received: from mail04.mail.aol.com by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.36.108.11 $/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA014558136; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 07:28:58 -0700
Received: by mail04.mail.aol.com (1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA226907918; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:25:18 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 10:25:18 -0400
From: WindFinder@aol.com-DeleteThis
Message-Id: <950420102517_89749840@aol.com-DeleteThis>
To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
Subject: Re: Save 3rd Ave


>From Mike Godsey
Windsight

I don't know how dense the proposed nets for the golf range are but they may
be more of a wind barrier than you would expect. Suprisingly barriers like
picket fences and open bushes block the wind for a greater distance than a
solid barrier likke a hill or a building. This happens because the pressure
drops behing a building as the wind races around the obstruction. This in
turn causes the wind to back eddy and fill in behind the building after a
relatively short distance. With an more oprn obstruction this phenomenon does
not occur and the wind is measuralbly and significantly lighter at a greater
distance down wind.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:29:06 PST