Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA14558; Thu, 22 Sep 1994 14:14:12 -0700 Return-Path: <James.Paugh@Eng.Sun.COM-DeleteThis> Received: from Sun.COM by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA23576; Thu, 22 Sep 1994 14:14:45 -0700 Received: from Eng.Sun.COM (mxchange.Eng.Sun.COM) by Sun.COM (sun-barr.Sun.COM) id AA12085; Thu, 22 Sep 94 14:10:22 PDT Received: from jurassic.Eng.Sun.COM by Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6.9/mh) id OAA29933; Thu, 22 Sep 1994 14:10:16 -0700 Received: from jalama.eng.sun.com by jurassic.Eng.Sun.COM (SMI-8.6.9/SMI-SVR4) id OAA06397; Thu, 22 Sep 1994 14:10:34 -0700 Received: by jalama.eng.sun.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA10953; Thu, 22 Sep 1994 14:10:32 -0700 Date: Thu, 22 Sep 1994 14:10:32 -0700 From: James.Paugh@Eng.Sun.COM-DeleteThis (Jim Paugh) Message-Id: <9409222110.AA10953@jalama.eng.sun.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: 3rd ave access, safety, etc. X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
> From: LafingGuy@aol.com-DeleteThis
> Does anyone else think smoke
> flares may provide a lot better visibility in the water during
> daylight?
I talked to a member of the Coast Guard at the Crissy Field SFBA
meeting last July, and he felt that flares and smokers were pretty
useless, due to their limited duration once fired. He recommended
a strobe light, even during the day.
~Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:28:09 PST