Received: from zonker-fddi.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA18959; Sun, 10 Jul 1994 13:18:09 -0700 Return-Path: <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Received: by zonker.hpl.hp.com (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA00367; Sun, 10 Jul 1994 13:18:05 -0700 Date: Sun, 10 Jul 1994 13:18:05 -0700 From: Ken Poulton <poulton@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <9407102018.AA00367@zonker.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Subject: Re: Re: Coyote / 3rd
> Okay here's the answer to the question about whether there were gaps in the
> wind a mile off shore on Thursday (due to northerly direction): NO. It was as
> solid as Coyote gets, although I didn't need to go more than a mile out
> because the wind was filled in to the "swimming" area. The only thing I felt
> was unusual was that the swells were better formed and closer to shore than
> usual.
I was curious about *farther* than one mile off shore.
> It seems to me that the best plan may be to drive past 3rd to Coyote or
> Sterling when the beeper sez it's windier at Coyote than it looks when
> crossing the San Mateo Bridge.
Personally, I'd rather not cross the bridge coming from Palo Alto. :-)
Ken Poulton
poulton@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis
"It is also a good rule not to put too much confidence in experimental
results until they have been confirmed by theory."
--Sir Arthur Eddington
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:27:50 PST