Received: from hplms26.hpl.hp.com by opus.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.8/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1) id AA08615; Thu, 2 Jun 1994 23:49:57 -0700 Return-Path: <ShreddinEd@aol.com-DeleteThis> Received: from mail02.prod.aol.net by hplms26.hpl.hp.com with SMTP (1.36.108.4/15.5+ECS 3.3+HPL1.1S) id AA10532; Thu, 2 Jun 1994 23:51:43 -0700 Received: by mail02.prod.aol.net (1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA24750; Fri, 3 Jun 1994 02:47:30 -0400 From: ShreddinEd@aol.com-DeleteThis X-Mailer: America Online Mailer Sender: "ShreddinEd" <ShreddinEd@aol.com-DeleteThis> Message-Id: <9406030247.tn781828@aol.com-DeleteThis> To: wind_talk@opus.hpl.hp.com-DeleteThis Date: Fri, 03 Jun 94 02:47:29 EDT Subject: Re: Sherman Island Tide Delay?
You asked:
>How much of a delay is there in the tide at Sherman Island
>as compared with the Golden Gate?
My tide charts show +4.05 at Rio Vista on high tide, and +5.13 at low. FYI,
in case you already didn't know, the Rio Vista Windsurfing Association has
killer tide charts for Sherman which come free with a membership. Beats the
heck out of converting from the Golden Gate. The graphical presentation is
nice, too.
The address is:
PO Box 547
Rio Vista, CA 94571
See ya on the water!
-shrEd
Ed Scott
ShreddinEd@aol.com-DeleteThis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 02:27:23 PST